MotoGP and Formula 1 are two of the world’s fastest motor races. Each has its own set of challenges, and both groups of drivers must push themselves to their limits while racing on the tracks where they compete. But which is faster?
Formula 1 automobiles are significantly quicker than MotoGP bikes, therefore F1 car laps are considerably quicker than MotoGP bike laps. Because they have considerably more downforce, F1 cars can turn much quicker than MotoGP bikes.
There are several more factors to consider when comparing the two sports than simply comparing lap times. Aside from the fact that Formula 1 cars have twice as many wheels, there are numerous other factors that distinguish F1 from MotoGP. Let’s look at some of the similarities and differences between MotoGP and F1.
The Differences Between Formula 1 And MotoGP
The Main Differences
The most apparent distinction between MotoGP and Formula 1 is the fact that F1 vehicles have four wheels versus two for motorcycles. Each vehicle faces different problems as a result of this, which we’ll address in further detail. Aside from the number of tires, the weight of each is also very distinct. A MotoGP bike weighs approximately 157 kg on its own, whereas an F1 car and driver must weigh at least 740 kg.
The bike and the vehicle are significantly different in size; this implies their engines are as well. The bikes use a four-cylinder, 1-liter engine that produces 280 horsepower. The Formula 1 automobiles have a 1.6-liter, hybrid V6 engine that can produce 1000 horsepower. This implies the bike has a greater power-to-weight ratio than the car, but there is much more to it than simply quantity of power.
The F1 car spins up at 0-100km/h, while the MotoGP bike can’t keep the front wheel on the ground. Both cars may achieve a 2.6s time in this area. MotoGP takes top honors in 0-200kph. In the F1 car, electronics take full control at around 180kph, whereas MotoGP riders can still manage the throttle in the motorcycle. The F1 vehicle does it in 5.2 seconds, but it takes 4.8 seconds for the motorbike. The single-seater F1 car needs only 10.6 seconds to reach 300 kilometers per hour, whereas the MotoGP bike requires 11.8s to do so (at least initially).
There isn’t much of a challenge. At the 2018 Austrian Grand Prix, Kimi Räikkönen drove his Ferrari around the Red Bull Ring in 1m 06.957s to establish the circuit’s quickest race lap. Johann Zarco set the fastest race lap at Spielberg with a speed of 182kph in 2017. In F1, average speeds are generally slower than those seen in MotoGP because F1 cars have greater rubber on the track and more incredible aerodynamics that boosts downforce with increased speed.
Two key issues confront the MotoGP bike here. Although the motorcycle is tiny, it lacks the aero perfection of a Formula One car. The greater tires and superior aerodynamics of the vehicle allow it to attain far greater traction than the single-seater can manage. The single-seater can fly in mid- and high-speed turns, slowing down from 312kph to a still-impressive 240kph. F1 drivers must merely moderate their speed in some bends; MotoGP riders must really hard on the brakes.
The F1 car has no equal in this arena, and it is capable of generating forces equivalent to 5G. MotoGP bikes can’t compete in cornering speed without wings, flaps, and so on. The single-seater is more stable owing to a lower center of gravity and better traction, while during hard braking, a MotoGP rear wheel is up in the air, necessitating an earlier brake application from the rider. When racing at 250 miles per hour or greater, a MotoGP driver must constantly use his body; whereas a driver for F1 cars simply has to work the steering wheel and pedals.
Are They Comparable?
Because the bikes have two wheels, comparing them to any automobile with four is difficult. Street motorcycles are frequently compared to automobiles on the street, but comparisons between MotoGP and F1 are very different. The MotoGP bikes aren’t a million miles from high-end road bicycles, but F1 cars are as dissimilar as you can get from your average automobile.
Big Power Difference
Although the vehicles are similar in many ways, they are clearly different breeds. If not, just take a look at the aerodynamics and downforce necessary for F1 to determine whether or not they’re two distinct kinds of automobiles. F1 cars keep the track firmly under control, whereas motorbikes simply by nature do not.
As a result, safety is an important factor in MotoGP and F1. The two sports seldom traverse the same routes, and when they do, modifications are frequently made to suit the motorcycles. Chicanes may be eliminated, for example, making comparisons even more difficult. Due to their downforce abilities, F1 cars can accelerate quickly into corners, whereas MotoGP riders must decrease speed dramatically
A Different Driving Style
The F1 cars have a short tail and big rims, but they drive as if they’re on a track. They frequently lean their bodies and knees to touch the ground when turning corners. Despite the fact that F1 drivers are still subjected to enormous G forces, their bodies are not as exposed as those of motorcyclists. This does not necessarily imply that they are safer; it just makes it simpler to commit to fast corners. The extra two tires provide them significantly more grip than motorcycles do.
The contact patches on F1 and MotoGP cars are significantly larger, allowing for greater grip. On the straights, MotoGP bikes can reach speeds of up to 200 mph, while F1 cars can reach speeds of up to 100 mph. However, F1 cars may take corners at speeds of 100+ mph, whereas motorcycles must slow down considerably. But regardless of their differences in driving styles, how do their lap times compare?
Do F1 And MotoGP Use the Same Tracks?
F1 and MotoGP share several tracks. F1 races on a number of locations that MotoGP does not use, such as Monaco and Spa, while MotoGP events on tracks F1 doesn’t visit, such as Indonesia’s and Argentina’s raceways. While a track must have an FIA Grade 1 license to host F1 racing, MotoGP requires an FIM license.
F1 vs MotoGP: Which Is Fastest?
Formula 1 cars are far more rapid than MotoGP motorcycles, therefore Formula One race times are considerably shorter than those of MotoGP. We previously stated that there are only a few places where both MotoGP and F1 can hold races. Even when they can do so, bikes frequently have modifications made. Nonetheless, there are still two clear examples that illustrate the significant gap between F1 and MotoGP.
The Silverstone Circuit in Great Britain is one of these tracks. Marc Marquez set the MotoGP lap record for 2019 with a time of 1 minute 58.168 seconds around the circuit. Max Verstappen broke the F1 lap record in 2020, setting a time of 1 minute 27.097 seconds. At Silverstone, there is a difference of more than 30 seconds between Formula 1 and MotoGP.
Circuit Of The Americas
The F1 lap record at the Circuit of the Americas in Austin, Texas, is 1 minute 36.169 seconds, with a qualifying lap around 4 seconds quicker still. The MotoGP benchmark, set in 2014, was 2 minutes 3.575 seconds; this was approximately 30 seconds slower than the F1 car racing game. When you consider that the difference between a first and second place in both sports is usually less than a second, this disparity is enormous.
Some corners in second or third gear are acceptable for MotoGP riders, while F1 drivers may take the same turns in fifth or sixth gear. The cars’ large amount of downforce and an enormous amount of grip at each wheel allow them to reach some corners well beyond the capabilities of motorcycles. Although bikes typically reach speeds of roughly 120 mph faster, the F1 vehicle can manage this speed through most bends.
MotoGP and Formula 1 are two different sports with a lot of intensity, albeit with comparable levels of speed. Due to their high levels of grip and downforce as well as their superior cornering capabilities, F1 cars are considerably quicker than any motorcycle around corners, despite the bikes’ ability to outrun them on straights.